On 21 June 2010 17:27, Uriel <ur...@berlinblue.org> wrote: > On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 12:56 PM, anonymous <ake7z...@lavabit.com> wrote: >> On Sun, Jun 20, 2010 at 09:46:12PM +0200, ⚖ Alexander "Surma" Surma wrote: >>> I was just about to ask, Creatives Common BY-SA? >> >> Already discussed on this list, but for software instead of art. >> Unlicense[1] for software, > > While in principle I like the idea of the 'unlicense', its legal value > is very questionable. For software and code sticking with the classic > BSD/MIT/ISC licenses is a much better idea. > > I personally 'dual-license' my code as ISC and then release it to the > public domain.
I kind of liked the license 20h was using in the past: "Copy me if you can" Cheers, Anselm
