On 14 June 2010 00:16, David Tweed <david.tw...@gmail.com> wrote: > One of the issues to consider is that what computers are used for > changes with time, and decisions that one may classify as "the > suckless way of doing things" at one point in time may mean that it's > not effectively useable in some future situations.
If the system is sufficiently modular it should be relatively future-proof. cls
