> tla? You must be joking, latest release dates 2006, it's code is > 150kSLOC (nearly 8 times Mercurial) -- most likely caused by the GNU > factor (==smoking too much weed) and the interface is completely > retarded (and always has been).
Uriel mentioned Tom Lord's ranting about svn, so I thought maybe someone still uses tla. And yes, it's bloated. I'd still prefer it over SVN any minute.
