> Not to mention the duplicty: > - something is suckless (completely void of suck) > - something does suck less (still some suck in it) > > These things are very different, and I think it's very, very hard to reach > the first meaning > I think option 2 is the commonly accepted one here, but meaning 1 sounds most > natural to me. > > Dieter > >
Nothing is completely void of suck.
