tis 4 aug. 2026 kl. 20:45 skrev Nathan Hartman <[email protected]>:

> On Tue, Aug 4, 2026 at 2:04 PM Nathan Hartman <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 4, 2026 at 12:37 PM Pavel Lyalyakin via dev <
> [email protected]> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hello,
> >
> > (snip)
> >>
> >> The thing is that the INSTALL document needs a major rework (I think
> that everyone can agree with this).
> >
> > (snip)
> >
> > I agree with this!
> >
> > It is something I have looked into in the past, but every time I did, I
> became overwhelmed by how extensively INSTALL needed to change.
> >
> > One good thing is that after the CMake & vcpkg build becomes the
> "official" way to build on Windows in 1.16, a huge amount of cruft can be
> removed (all of section II-E). That will result in renumbering the later
> sections, so maybe it's a good time to just go in there with a wrecking
> ball.
> >
> > Thanks for giving INSTALL some much needed love!!
> >
> > By the way, I don't agree that it's not glamorous: for many users,
> INSTALL is likely one of the first pieces of documentation they encounter
> once they decide to try Subversion. It was for me when I installed
> Subversion for my $dayjob for the first time in 2007. INSTALL was very
> good, very clear, and it gave me confidence that I was dealing with a well
> made tool. There's something glamorous in that :-)
> >
> > Cheers,
>
>
> I have nominated both changes (r1936876, r1936877) for backport to
> 1.15.x in r1936879.
>
> Cheers,
> Nathan


I don’t have access to my computer tonight so I cannot vote but if you are
able, would you like to add my +1 and approve (since it is not core code) ?

/Daniel


>

Reply via email to