On Sat, Jun 17, 2023 at 7:33 AM Daniel Sahlberg <daniel.l.sahlb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Den fre 16 juni 2023 kl 09:49 skrev Osipov, Michael (SMD IT IN) via users < > us...@subversion.apache.org>: > >> Scratch that. My thread from five years ago is still valid: >> https://lists.apache.org/thread/lonftwtj2kmnjf5mlp91jyxz9xlsgv3d >> >> The issue sill persists. The doc improvement from Daniel Shahaf haven't >> been implemented yet. >> > > Moving the discussion to dev@: > > Do we want to implement the suggested doc improvement? I started testing > each of the commands and the @ trick is required on almost all except for > svn checkout so it will be a lot of changed text. Does it make sense or > will it only be a cause of confusion? > I think it's a good idea as it will help to make the documentation more clear and complete. I added the explanation as a separate text to allow for some re-use but the > argument has many different names (PATH, WCPATH, URL ...) so it is repeated > a few times, maybe it can be reworded to leave out the argument name? > Hmmm, it looks like we're not entirely consistent: In my mind, PATH could be a working copy path or a repository path, while WCPATH must be a working copy path. But, looking at the help strings for, e.g., 'svn add', it calls for a PATH; I would expect to see WCPATH... (Is there a way to schedule a path already in the repository for addition?) Cheers Nathan
