Den tors 21 jan. 2021 kl 17:58 skrev Daniel Sahlberg < daniel.l.sahlb...@gmail.com>:
> Den tors 21 jan. 2021 17:16Daniel Shahaf <d...@daniel.shahaf.name> skrev: > >> Daniel Sahlberg wrote on Thu, 21 Jan 2021 07:21 +00:00: >> > Den ons 20 jan. 2021 kl 23:56 skrev Nathan Hartman < >> hartman.nat...@gmail.com>: >> > > On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 11:16 AM Daniel Shahaf < >> d...@daniel.shahaf.name> wrote: >> > >> How about linking to mail-archives.apache.org, or to a sane third- >> > >> party archive? I know lists.a.o is "official" but unless it has >> > >> changed its spots since I last looked, I'd have zero problems with >> > >> linking to other archives. The javascript-wall is just one issue. >> > > >> > > The biggest thing that drives me up the wall with lists.a.o is the >> mile-long URLs. The only reason I use them is because I've heard >> whisperings that this is ASF's preferred long-term archive and the other >> one might disappear someday. But I would it be the other way around. >> > >> > I have switched to a google site search on mail-archives.a.o. I had to >> > resort to a javascript hack to add "inurl:subversion" to the search >> > term, otherwise we would get results from all mailing lists (httpd, >> > tomcat, ponymail etc.). Side effect is that it shows in the search box >> > if you go back from google. >> > >> > Committed r1885743 >> >> Thanks, Daniel! >> >> If there's a way to make that work without requiring javascript, that'd >> be great. If nothing else, presetting the textbox's value to >> "inurl:subversion" and then removing that in javascript unconditionally >> might work? >> > > I'm not a web designer, never will be. But according to my searches the > inurl has to be part of the search string, it can't be passed as a separate > field in the query string. I'd be happy if I'm proven wrong. > > I think it will confuse users to have it as a predefined value in the > input box. A possible solution would be to have it in the html file, remove > it with javascript when the document is loaded and the adding it again on > submit. That way it would work for user without javascript (with a slight > inconvenience) as well. But how many is that really these days? > Finally found some time to look at this again. I've committed r1886109 which: * Add inurl:subversion as the default value to the textbox. * Remove it in body.onload. * Add it again when the form is submitted. The last two obviously only happen to users with javascript enabled. Feel free to test it at https://subversion-staging.apache.org/mailing-lists.html /Daniel Sahlberg >
