Nathan Hartman wrote on Thu, 10 Oct 2019 21:12 +00:00: > On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 4:54 PM Daniel Shahaf <d...@daniel.shahaf.name> wrote: > > > > Nathan Hartman wrote on Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 16:28:21 -0400: > > > If we have to pull that item out (not saying we do yet, just IF), then > > > that > > > leaves us with no Python tasks. I'd like to have something Python-related > > > on the list because there's a good chance that a 700+ member university > > > hackathon will have some Python programmers. Any other suggested > > > Python tasks we could add? > > > > Something in the test harness. For example, make it easier to run «make > > check» > > with client version ≠ server version, to actually test on-the-wire > > compatibility. Or use trunk client and trunk server, but make them both > > expose > > fewer capabilities, to test that compatibility codepaths. > > Has any work been done on making the test harness Py3 compatible?
>From autogen.sh to 'make check', all steps pass with PYTHON=/usr/bin/python3. Julian, do you have any release.py tasks to suggest?
