Branko Čibej wrote: > On 27.09.2018 19:02, Julian Foad wrote: > > [...] maybe it would be better to just not create the "XShelf" short name > > [...] > > > > But also I want to remember that the priority right now is to get 1.11 out > > with something that works, first, and then improve it later. > > If we keep the XName form in, we have to document that these classes are > experimental and all the usual disclaimers apply.
Now I've changed it to not create a short name like "XShelf" at all. A long name like Svn::Ext::Client::Svn_client__shelf_t is still available. I think that will be sufficient for 1.11 now, won't it? Can someone review the updated backport nomination please? -- - Julian
