On 27.09.2018 19:02, Julian Foad wrote: > Julian Foad wrote: >> Svn::Client::XShelf > Testing it like this: > > $ configure [...] --with-ruby-sitedir=$PREFIX/site_ruby [...] > [...] > $ make install-swig-rb > [...] > $ irb -I $PREFIX/site_ruby/2.3.0 -I > $PREFIX/site_ruby/usr/local/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/site_ruby > irb(main):001:0> require "svn/client" > => true > irb(main):002:0> Svn::Client::XShelf > => Svn::Ext::Client::Svn_client__shelf_t > > ... shows that the long version of the name is exposed anyway, so maybe it > would be better to just not create the "XShelf" short name at all, if that > works. That might be more consistent with what we do for swig-py. I'll try it. > > But also I want to remember that the priority right now is to get 1.11 out > with something that works, first, and then improve it later.
If we keep the XName form in, we have to document that these classes are experimental and all the usual disclaimers apply. -- Brane
