On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 9:03 AM Daniel Shahaf <d...@daniel.shahaf.name> wrote:
> Troy Curtis Jr wrote on Thu, 30 Nov 2017 02:20 +0000: > > On Wed, Nov 29, 2017, 10:08 AM Daniel Shahaf > > > But if you think it should go ahead and get put to trunk I'd be happy to > do > > so, you may be worried that I'm dragging this swig-py3 branch thing out > :P > > I just think that, as a matter of best practices, small commits that are > independent of the branch should go to trunk directly (& can be cherry- > picked back to the feature branch). You shouldn't read any "slow > progress" concern into it, no more than you should take offence at me > wearing a seat belt while you're driving. > Huh, yeah that does make sense. I'll keep that in mind! > > > While reviewing this I noticed that > > > subversion/bindings/swig/proxy/svn_*.swg > > > are created in the source dir rather than in the build dir. I suspect > > > that might be a bug but I'm not familiar enough with these swig > details. > > > > > > > > Since I've been working in this area, I'll take a look and add a fix as > > necessary. > > Thanks! > > Cheers, > > Daniel > > > Thanks! > > Troy >
