On 09.02.2017 14:16, Andreas Stieger wrote: > You would not use the .pot but the .po, so as to not loose existing > translations. > For other translations: setting them up in Pootle, I did not want to presume > that other po maintainers would want to do that. > > Pootle has automation opportunities of scanning the code base, have not > explored. > > Is that something we want to kick off for the next release?
It wouldn't hurt to bring Subversion into the 20th century, at least as far as translations are concerned. :) I can help with any scripting but can't promise to lead this effort ... NoTimeTM. -- Brane
