On Wed, Sep 02, 2015 at 04:01:08PM +0200, Johan Corveleyn wrote: > ISTR that in this community we try to treat a veto as a signal that > further discussion is needed, or that more work is needed to resolve > the question / issue. You may ask / suggest a revert if you think > that's best, but it's mainly up for discussion how to best resolve > things (and other avenues, such as further commits, may also resolve > the issue). > > Of course, in some circumstances there is more pressure to revert > quickly (e.g. when the build is broken, or other developer's work is > blocked for other reasons, or ...). But usually we try to work our way > towards consensus without "forcing" a revert. > > On the other hand, it might have been better for Stefan to wait for > your reaction first, and discuss the issue and a possible solution, > before making further changes ... > It's not like this is such an urgent matter that it cannot wait for a > couple of days ... > > Just my 2 cents, > -- > Johan
+1 Thank you for writing this!
