On 2 Sep 2015 2:44 pm, "Evgeny Kotkov" <[email protected]> wrote:
> I stated my veto and provided the justification that covers both r1700305 > and r1698359. So, could you please revert both of them? Reworking and > adding changes on top of it is going to increase the mess and will be harder > to review. Uh, sorry, you don't get to dictate how the veto gets resolved. Reworking what's on trunk is as valid as reverting. If you don't intend to work on the solution, you may as well just let Stefan do that whichever way works best for him. -- Brane
