Stefan Fuhrmann <stefan.fuhrm...@wandisco.com> writes: [...]
> r1686554 removes the intermedite source repo locking layer. You may try > reverting the remainder r1589284, resolve the conflicts and review the > result. If you then still think that the resulting patch is an > improvement, by all means commit it. I reverted the remaining part of r1589284 and committed what I think is a proper replacement for hotcopy_setup_shared_fs_data() in r1687070, r1687071, r1687074 and r1687078 [1,2,3,4]. These changes do not solve any immediately visible problems, but I think that that's a better way of bootstrapping the hotcopy process. [...] > Good. I prepared the patches on trunk and will now add them to > STATUS for review. As I see, this nomination is already approved for 1.9.x. I can confirm that it solves the discussed problem — at least, in a couple of quick tests. I'll try to put a proper vote in /STATUS in the next hour. Thank you. [1] https://svn.apache.org/r1687070 [2] https://svn.apache.org/r1687071 [3] https://svn.apache.org/r1687074 [4] https://svn.apache.org/r1687078 Regards, Evgeny Kotkov
