Branko Čibej <br...@wandisco.com> writes:
> If '--quiet' means 'suppress progress', then the result is exactly as
> expected. We could change 'svnadmin verify' to behave differently, e.g.,
> only display error notifications in --quiet mode; I agree that would be
> better than the current behaviour, but again, this has nothing to do
> with the API itself.
I don't think that the current behavior — entirely losing error information —
is expected. For example, here is what "svnadmin help verify" says about -q:
-q [--quiet] : no progress (only errors to stderr)
> I think we're at the point where we're trying to polish the UI. It is
> rather late in the day for that. The minor tweak required in svnadmin to
> emit errors in --quiet mode can be pushed into RC3, but I'd pretty much
> stop there; we can always make minor UI changes later on. I wouldn't
> change svn_repos_verify_fs3 any more; it's consistent and does what it
> advertises.
Fine, but I suspect that this fix probably isn't going to address the very last
problem in the --keep-going code. It would be a pity to delay Subversion
1.9.0 because of that.
Regards,
Evgeny Kotkov
