> On Nov 7, 2014, at 6:46 AM, Branko Čibej <br...@wandisco.com> wrote: > >> On 07.11.2014 14:07, Ivan Zhakov wrote: >> Actually, I have used my veto on the log addressing feature two months >> ago [1]. > > How many times do how many people have to explain that saying "-1" > without substantiating that with technical reasons is not a valid veto? > > -- Brane
I think it is fair to ask whether it makes sense to introduce a fairly risky feature that adds marginal benefits into a mature and stable area of the code. I question why we are even still introducing these new fsfs formats when the benefits are relatively small. Build FSX, make it awesome then make it the default someday. I am not going to block 1.9 over this but I wish we'd stop doing these sort of "improvements". In the past, I also thought we were against adding features that exposed a bunch of obscure configuration options as well. Stepping on a plane in a few ... Mark
