On 04.11.2014 17:58, Branko Čibej wrote: > You still have, and always will have, the option to raise a veto. With > arguments. About specific problems in the code. I've asked you to do > that uncountable times. So now please don't try to hide behind > community decisions and raise that veto already, so that we can > discuss it and bring this sad state of affairs to an end.
Just to be clear: A vote would not in any way change your, or anyone else's, opinion of the log-addressing feature; we'd get some +1 votes and some -1 votes, and maybe the vote would pass or maybe not. But it would not solve any real problems. Compare this to our backport voting, where -1 /is/ a veto, with all the consequences and requirements to make it valid. That is why I said that a vote makes no sense for code that's already on trunk; but a veto does. -- Brane
