On 29.08.2014 20:12, Julian Foad wrote: > Please everyone calm down. > > From scanning this conversation, it looks like the main technical substance > is that a commit exposed some symbols wrongly, and the layering of the > functionality may need to be improved. Or something like that. (Exactly what > the technical issues are, is not the point of this email.) > > ** This is not a crisis. **
Yes, it is. I'm referring to the fact that we're in the situation that one developer's commits are /a priori/ considered suspect by another developer. This state of affairs has been escalating for months, for reasons that are not entirely clear to me; but it needs to stop, not be waved off as just another technical disagreement. There's been an unacceptable lack of good judgement displayed on both sides of the fence. I do not want this community to blow up over what is, when all is said and done, a series of rather trivial technical details. I also do not want to see this ludicrous ping-pong of changes and vetos continue indefinitely. -- Brane -- Branko Čibej | Director of Subversion WANdisco | Realising the impossibilities of Big Data e. br...@wandisco.com
