On 19 August 2014 15:34, Stefan Fuhrmann <stefan.fuhrm...@wandisco.com> wrote: > Hi there, > > At the SHF hackathon, we talked what tools should be installed > by default and which should be part of tools. > > We decided to make > > * svn-bench (reported as useful in the field) and I agree that 'svn-bench' could be useful for users, but what is the reason for non-standard naming? Why this tool is not named 'svnbench' ?
> * svnfsfs (disaster recovery tools should be available by default) > I doubt that 'svnfsfs' can be moved to "main" Subversion in the current state because it uses internal library headers and functions from libsvn_fs_fs: [[[ #include "../libsvn_fs_fs/index.h" #include "../libsvn_fs_fs/pack.h" #include "../libsvn_fs_fs/rev_file.h" #include "../libsvn_fs_fs/util.h" ]]] Have you considered this? What is about ABI/API issues? Note that we never include such headers in current Subversion code except "fs-loader.h" and tests. -- Ivan Zhakov CTO | VisualSVN | http://www.visualsvn.com
