Bert Huijben wrote on Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 23:00:31 +0200: > But note that the original patch this discussion started with, did > exactly the opposite: It decoupled the message and the error code, > which made svn produce the warning that it didn't understand the > error. > > So: how about agree-ing that introducing this intermediate, > untranslatable error was not the right thing to do?
I already acknowledged that the original patch had a bug (it caused a "APR doesn't know this error code" to appear in the chain), and fixed that bug in r1501371.
