On Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 09:13:07PM -0400, Greg Stein wrote: > On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 9:10 PM, Greg Stein <gst...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 8:15 PM, Daniel Shahaf <danie...@apache.org> wrote: > >>... > >> So, I submit that your veto lacks a technical basis, and is therefore > >> invalid, > >> and has no standing. > > > > You do not get to make that decision. Certainly not unilaterally. If > > you feel it is invalid, then your course of action is to bring it to > > the PMC's private list. Make your case, and then the PMC can take a > > vote to eject Bert from the PMC, thus making his veto non-binding. > > And I should add: you'll need to make a similar argument to the Board, > since the PMC would merely be recommending removal. The Board passes a > resolution (or other decision making process) to effect the actual > removal. > > So yeah... you've got a rough hill to climb on this one :-)
Huh? A veto not accompanied by a technical reason is invalid. I am seeking consensus on the dev@ list that no technical reason was given. No one is going to strip anyone's bits. Daniel
