Daniel Shahaf wrote on Thu, Jul 04, 2013 at 23:24:55 +0300: > David Schweikert wrote on Thu, Jul 04, 2013 at 16:00:05 +0200: > > On Thu, Jul 04, 2013 at 15:56:45 +0200, Johan Corveleyn wrote: > > > Beware though that post-commit hooks may be running concurrently, and > > > your 'svn update' launched by $REV might still be running when $REV+1 > > > tries to start 'svn update'. > > > > I can see that it could be a problem. Not for us in this case, because > > we serialize the post-commits anyway already with a lock file. > > post-commit hooks may fire out of order, ie, r5 post-commi thook may be
s/r5/r6/ > invoked *before* r5 post-commit.
