Stefan Sperling wrote on Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 15:40:18 +0200: > On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 04:05:54PM +0300, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > > Daniel Shahaf wrote on Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 15:52:32 +0300: > > > No, we should extend the test to run 'svn ls' or 'svnadmin verify' to > > > ensure that creating the path with \n in it didn't break anything. > > Fair enough, that's good enough for me. > > But please also check that log -v returns a good list of paths. > With the FSFS \n problem, 'svn ls' was fine but 'log -v' was > broken (dirent data vs changed paths data). > Verify didn't detect the 'log -v' problem (see > http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4343). > > Can you also rename allow_newlines to just 'is_fsfs', please? > > Thanks!
Done, and nominated for backport: http://svn.apache.org/r1498489 Thanks, Daniel
