On 05/17/2013 10:55 AM, Philip Martin wrote: > Branko Čibej <br...@wandisco.com> writes: > >> On 17.05.2013 15:32, i...@apache.org wrote: >>> --- subversion/branches/1.8.x/STATUS (original) >>> +++ subversion/branches/1.8.x/STATUS Fri May 17 13:32:56 2013 >>> @@ -124,6 +124,14 @@ Candidate changes: >>> Votes: >>> +1: stefan2 (for 1.8.1) >>> >>> +* r1483781 >>> + Fix FSFS repository corruption on power or network disk failure on >>> Windows: >>> + http://svn.haxx.se/dev/archive-2013-05/0245.shtml >>> + Justification: >>> + Repository corruption. Regression from 1.6.x >>> + Votes: >>> + +1: ivan >>> + >> >> Is this considered a blocker? Should we roll RC3 next week and restart >> the soak period? > > We should put this into 1.8.0 but I don't think it is a destabilizing > change so we don't need to restart the soak.
I agree. Soak time extensions are tied to the complexity of the change, not the severity of the bug fixed. -- C. Michael Pilato <cmpil...@collab.net> CollabNet <> www.collab.net <> Enterprise Cloud Development
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
