On 17.05.2013 15:58, Ivan Zhakov wrote: > On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 5:53 PM, Branko Čibej <br...@wandisco.com> wrote: >> On 17.05.2013 15:32, i...@apache.org wrote: >>> --- subversion/branches/1.8.x/STATUS (original) >>> +++ subversion/branches/1.8.x/STATUS Fri May 17 13:32:56 2013 >>> @@ -124,6 +124,14 @@ Candidate changes: >>> Votes: >>> +1: stefan2 (for 1.8.1) >>> >>> +* r1483781 >>> + Fix FSFS repository corruption on power or network disk failure on >>> Windows: >>> + http://svn.haxx.se/dev/archive-2013-05/0245.shtml >>> + Justification: >>> + Repository corruption. Regression from 1.6.x >>> + Votes: >>> + +1: ivan >>> + >> Is this considered a blocker? Should we roll RC3 next week and restart >> the soak period? >> > I consider this a blocker. I'm also proposed to backport to 1.7.x and > I think we cannot release 1.8.0 with regression against latest 1.7.x. > > But problem that we have other places with the same problem in FSFS > code. In setrevprop code for example. I'm going to find them and fix.
Understood. Thanks for finding this -- and BTW I agree with your analysis, it reminded me that I saw similar behaviour (file renamed after power cycle, but contents gone) years ago on a completely unrelated project. In other words, +1 for fixing this in 1.8.0. -- Brane -- Branko Čibej Director of Subversion | WANdisco | www.wandisco.com
