Julian Foad wrote: >>[...] As it is >> right now if you're keeping your clocks in sync it should work okay. >> But unless I'm missing something that's not the case after this >> change. > > That's true, given that the current implementation doesn't look at the > timestamps when deciding whether or how long to sleep. So the safe thing to > do > is reintroduce a sleep even if using commit times, for all applicable > operations > (checkout, update, switch, revert). > > I'll commit this soon. (Running tests now.)
r1464769. - Julian
