C. Michael Pilato wrote: > On 04/02/2013 04:04 PM, Julian Foad wrote: >> For the future, it seems to me that the tracking of whether we need to >> sleep should be done inside libsvn_wc, as only there do we really know >> whether we have made a change that relies on the timestamp. > > This makes sense. File an ENHANCEMENT issue for it?
Good idea. <http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4342>, "Sleep for timestamps should be determined by libsvn_wc". - Julian
