On 03/28/2013 08:22 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> See above, and yes if we end up opting for the backend-specific
> implementation then the new fs.conf file will go away.

If this is to be done at all, it should be backend-specific.  No sense in
preemptively penalizing every backends' (current and future) performance
"just in case".  After all, one of our existing backends has a long history
of not having these sorts of data-munging bugs ... and is already
sufficiently slow thankyouverymuch.  :-)

-- 
C. Michael Pilato <cmpil...@collab.net>
CollabNet   <>   www.collab.net   <>   Enterprise Cloud Development

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to