On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 10:08 AM, Julian Foad
<julianf...@btopenworld.com> wrote:
> That's no better than the current typical usage of
> RegexOutput('regex1|regex2|regex3|...', match_all=...), is it?
Fair point.
> Lots of our tests contain code that tries to work around the limitations or
> simply doesn't test for as strict a match as it ought to, because the
> available Output classes don't provide a way to match a sequence of lines in
> a specific order.
>
> So, implementing (2) would be useful.
Based on your prior point I think the second option is the useful change.
