On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 2:54 AM, Bert Huijben <b...@qqmail.nl> wrote:
>
> I think you should be able to do this without your patch if you use
>
> expected_err = svntest.verify.RegexOutput([
> # lines here
> ])
>
> Instead of
> expected_err = [
> # lines here
> ]
>
> Just like how we handle separate kinds of output (items, unordered, regex,
> unordered regex, any text, or a plain list)
Nope it would be:
svntest.verify.RegexOutput('regexhere', match_all=False)
Note that you get ONE regex. Unless you pass the match_all=False then
that regex must match every line of output. If you do pass
match_all=False then as soon as it matches any line of the output then
it is considered successful.
I haven't looked at his patch but something that allows you to provide
a list of regex's that matches one regex against each line might be
nice.
I was working on a test just yesterday where I actually verified
output twice because I wanted to check two lines and didn't want to
match exact output.
