On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 04:52:15PM -0500, C. Michael Pilato wrote: > I also seem to recall Stefan also saying something about not having time to > work on this stuff for the remainder of 2012, but I can't find a reference > for that at the moment, so perhaps I just misremembered.
I said so on IRC. I'm fully booked by elego customers for most of each week until Christmas, which is why I don't have much time I can invest into Subversion this month. > OWNERSHIP: Given Philip's comment, I believe it is reasonable to deem him > the owner of this body of work, or at least co-owner with a > possibly-time-constrained Stefan. But perhaps all there is to "own" is the > post-branch removal of the feature? I'd prefer to get moves on trunk into a releasable state, or cut the feature out on trunk and put it back in after branching 1.8. I believe removing the feature would be somewhat invasive so it makes sense to do so on trunk in several steps, rather than on the release branch which is supposed to be stable at the time it is created. Obviously, fixing updates of moves would be even better :) I hope Philip or someone else can find time for this. I'll definitely get back to this in January, see where things are at that point, and move forward into whatever direction seems reasaonable.
