On Nov 22, 2012, at 11:50 AM, Branko Čibej <br...@wandisco.com> wrote:
> On 22.11.2012 15:19, Bert Huijben wrote: >> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Branko Čibej [mailto:br...@wandisco.com] >>> Sent: donderdag 22 november 2012 11:04 >>> To: dev@subversion.apache.org >>> Subject: Re: svn commit: r1412418 - in /subversion/trunk/subversion: >>> include/private/svn_string_private.h libsvn_subr/string.c >>> >>> On 22.11.2012 10:30, Bert Huijben wrote: >>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>> From: br...@apache.org [mailto:br...@apache.org] >>>>> Sent: donderdag 22 november 2012 06:21 >>>>> To: comm...@subversion.apache.org >>>>> Subject: svn commit: r1412418 - in /subversion/trunk/subversion: >>>>> include/private/svn_string_private.h libsvn_subr/string.c >>>>> >>>>> Author: brane >>>>> Date: Thu Nov 22 05:20:51 2012 >>>>> New Revision: 1412418 >>>>> >>>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1412418&view=rev >>>>> Log: >>>>> Groundwork for issue #4261. Invent memory buffers. >>>> Issue #4261 is called "Setting unknown svn: propnames should require >>> 'force'", so I think you want to reference a different issue number here. >>> >>> Nope, this is exactly what I'm laying the groundwork for. As will become >>> obvious in the next couple days. >> Thanks Daniel: >> 15:04 <@danielsh> Bert: the last comment on #4261 >> 15:04 <@danielsh> where brane says he's getting carried away and >> implementing a spellchecker >> 15:05 <@Bert> "the spelling in the error message"? >> 15:05 <@danielsh> "Unknown propname 'svn:ingore'; did you mean 'svn:ignore'?" >> 15:17 <@Bert> The problem would only be that we don't show an error on typos >> in the 'svn:' part. > > How did you come to the conclusion that we don't, I mean won't? :) > >> 15:17 <@Bert> But thanks for explaining. Now it finally makes sense. > > I'll try to remember to explain things a bit more proactively and > prophetically Just a thought. We do not have many svn: props. Couldn't we just list all of them? If we knew they were setting on a folder or file we could further limit it to that subset. Seems a lot easier and just as useful, perhaps even more useful. Mark
