On 22.11.2012 15:19, Bert Huijben wrote: > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Branko Čibej [mailto:br...@wandisco.com] >> Sent: donderdag 22 november 2012 11:04 >> To: dev@subversion.apache.org >> Subject: Re: svn commit: r1412418 - in /subversion/trunk/subversion: >> include/private/svn_string_private.h libsvn_subr/string.c >> >> On 22.11.2012 10:30, Bert Huijben wrote: >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: br...@apache.org [mailto:br...@apache.org] >>>> Sent: donderdag 22 november 2012 06:21 >>>> To: comm...@subversion.apache.org >>>> Subject: svn commit: r1412418 - in /subversion/trunk/subversion: >>>> include/private/svn_string_private.h libsvn_subr/string.c >>>> >>>> Author: brane >>>> Date: Thu Nov 22 05:20:51 2012 >>>> New Revision: 1412418 >>>> >>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1412418&view=rev >>>> Log: >>>> Groundwork for issue #4261. Invent memory buffers. >>> Issue #4261 is called "Setting unknown svn: propnames should require >> 'force'", so I think you want to reference a different issue number here. >> >> Nope, this is exactly what I'm laying the groundwork for. As will become >> obvious in the next couple days. > Thanks Daniel: > 15:04 <@danielsh> Bert: the last comment on #4261 > 15:04 <@danielsh> where brane says he's getting carried away and implementing > a spellchecker > 15:05 <@Bert> "the spelling in the error message"? > 15:05 <@danielsh> "Unknown propname 'svn:ingore'; did you mean 'svn:ignore'?" > 15:17 <@Bert> The problem would only be that we don't show an error on typos > in the 'svn:' part.
How did you come to the conclusion that we don't, I mean won't? :) > 15:17 <@Bert> But thanks for explaining. Now it finally makes sense. I'll try to remember to explain things a bit more proactively and prophetically in future. -- Brane -- Branko Čibej Director of Subversion | WANdisco | www.wandisco.com
