Here is a complete patch that I tested - more work needs to be done on the tests, but currently all tests that are run, succeed on my system.
I based this on trunk today.
On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 8:57 AM, Michael Chletsos <mpchl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Sorry - I am having one of those morning - this one should be good, I
> keep reversing my files and my thoughts . . .
>
> I will check out trunk later and fix the patches and this patch and
> make them all nice and be real.
>
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 8:54 AM, Peter Samuelson <pe...@p12n.org> wrote:
>>
>> [Michael Chletsos]
>>> sorry about confusion - here is the updated patch, with swig updates.
>>
>> Your patch seems to be reversed ('diff -u {new} {old}' whereas what
>> everyone wants to see is 'diff -u {old} {new}' or 'svn diff'), and also
>> seems to have been developed against something older than Subversion
>> trunk. I note for example that you change some Config to RbConfig, a
>> change that was made in Subversion trunk months ago in r1337514.
>>
>> Please update your Subversion checkout to the current trunk, apply your
>> patch, then run 'svn diff' to generate a more current patch.
>>
>> Peter
ruby1.9.3.patch
Description: Binary data
