I would support 1.9.3 - ruby 1.9.2 and 1.9.1 are not considered good versions and are problematic.
The current patch I used does not fix the configure script, I could modify that to only use <= 1.8.7 or >= 1.9.3 if you like. On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 5:31 AM, Philip Martin <philip.mar...@wandisco.com> wrote: > Michael Chletsos <mpchl...@gmail.com> writes: > >> OK - first, I would not support ruby 1.9.1 - I assume that you really >> have 1.9.2 (debian/ubuntu uses a meta-package)- can you show me the >> output of ruby -v >> >> I would support ruby 1.9.3 and above - there were issues with 1.9.1 and >> 1.9.2. > > I used whatever was part of Debian stable: > > ii ruby1.9.1 1.9.2.0-2 Interpreter of object-oriented scripting lan > > If 1.9.1 and 1.9.2 are not supported then the patch has to be modified > to refuse to accpet them. According to the package: > > Ruby uses two parallel versioning schemes: the `Ruby library compatibility > version' (1.9.1 for this package), which is similar to a library SONAME, and > the `Ruby version' (1.9.3 for this package). > > Which versions should we support? > > -- > Certified & Supported Apache Subversion Downloads: > http://www.wandisco.com/subversion/download
