Ben Reser <b...@reser.org> writes: > 1) local moves/renames. Based on the conversation I had on IRC this seems > to be not done yet due to issues found in the original plan. stsp says > that if it can't be done before we want to otherwise release 1.8 he'd like > to pull the move code entirely. So the question here is do we wait for > some unknown amount of time for this to complete? Is this an important 1.8 > feature?
I'd like to get this in. The local-move/incoming-edit stuff is not a huge task, I think we could get it working before the end of the year. > 3) libsvn_ra_serf stabilization. I know there have been a couple concerns > that Philip has raised (EAGAIN and the random failures). Plus there are > several issues here (not all of the issues here are serf issues): > http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/buglist.cgi?issue_status=UNCONFIRMED&issue_status=NEW&issue_status=STARTED&issue_status=REOPENED&subcomponent=libsvn_ra_serf&subcomponent=libsvn_ra_neon > > Who can drive these issues to completion? Is there any additional testing > work we should do to try and determine the stability of serf in light of > the fact that we're planning to remove neon? Reinstate neon? serf has never seemed to be good enough to justify removing neon: on the client side it is not as reliable, on the server side the overhead in some cases is still worrying. -- Certified & Supported Apache Subversion Downloads: http://www.wandisco.com/subversion/download
