On Thu, Nov 01, 2012 at 03:11:57PM -0400, C. Michael Pilato wrote: > On 11/01/2012 02:42 PM, Ben Reser wrote: > > Also at the risk of opening a can of worms we need to decide on the wc > > upgrade issue? I can say that the impression I got from Subversion Live was > > that a lot of people use multiple clients and that auto-upgrade seems bad. > > But we also discussed trying to handle reads from an older wcng style wc > > without requiring a wc upgrade. Can someone drive this? > > I distinctly recall stsp offering to take up the charge on this. :-)
I went ahead and disabled auto-upgrades in r1404856. This doesn't preclude the option of re-enabling auto-upgrade in case we can somehow get read-only operations to work without requiring an upgrade. If there's any further discussion to be had on this I'm happy to participate.
