C. Michael Pilato wrote: > On 07/11/2012 09:12 AM, Branko Čibej wrote: >> That is correct. Essentially, not only does the server have to know >> about and correctly record renames; the rename operations in the update >> (or merge) editor drive need to happen in the correct order so that they >> can be reflected in the working copy filesystem. > > Yup. Thankfully, the `changes' table in the FS is ordered. But does Ev2 > allow us to "play back" those operations, in order, without violating > some constraint?
Let's take this discussion of renames to a new thread, please. - Julian
