On 11.07.2012 12:44, Julian Foad wrote: > Branko Čibej wrote: >> Am I correct in assuming that most of this discussion is a consequence >> of the current implementation of mergeinfo inheritance? I.e., that there >> are a certain number of hoops one needs to jump through in order to >> determine which, if any, mergeinfo applies to a particular file (or >> subtree)? > No; the inheritance algorithm is simple enough. > > This discussion is about how to compare what "works" now (in 1.7) versus what > "works the same" or "works better" or "works worse" in a proposed "symmetric" > implementation. It's a matter of devising a way to enumerate all the > possible the cases systematically, so that we have a way to answer the > question "do all the cases that work in 1.7 still work in the proposed > implementation?"
Thanks; and sorry for the misunderstanding. I plead airport lounge at 5 a.m. after 3 hours' sleep. -- Brane -- Certified & Supported Apache Subversion Downloads: http://www.wandisco.com/subversion/download
