On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 8:48 AM, Hyrum K Wright <hyrum.wri...@wandisco.com>wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 2:40 PM, Vladimir Berezniker <v...@hitechman.com> > wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 8:13 AM, Hyrum K Wright < > hyrum.wri...@wandisco.com> > > wrote: > >> * We're in the middle of a rather large effort to move from the > >> current delta editor to something called Ev2. Ev2 should be simpler > >> from a bindings perspective, but it won't be fully implemented for a > >> while. When it is implemented, it's something you'll want to support, > >> but we don't have a concrete timeline for it, yet. > > > > > > I saw the emails and took a peek on the branch, it did look simpler to > me. > > I did not look at it in huge detail though. I figured I need to get > > javahl-ra to a > > stable point and then see what it takes to port it to ev2 branch, once > the > > editor > > v2 API considered stable enough (which it could be already). > > The best place to look would be svn_editor.h, which defines the formal > API specification. The API itself is very stable by this point, it's > just simply* a matter converting the existing systems over to it. > Because the delta editor is deeply embedded across a large part of the > codebase, this is an ongoing piece of work. > > The RA layer (on trunk) already exposes Ev2 via the > svn_ra__get_commit_ev2() API. Feel free to use it, knowing that its > implementation is still quite experimental, and that it may change / > go away at some point (but not the Ev2 concept). > That is great, it will make it much easier being able to work with it straight on the javahl-branch. Thank you, Vladimir
