Joe Swatosh <joe.swat...@gmail.com> writes: > What is the best way to proceed? Revert the Hyrum's commit of my patch > that hid the change in behavior? Can you (or someone else) write a > test that makes direct assertions about this behavior, so that the > only test of it isn't hidden away in the Ruby bindings tests? Any > brainwaves on getting the behavior back (short of reverting r1293375)?
I have added an XFail core regression test to svnlook_tests.py. When that is fixed we should be able to revert r1293375 and have the Ruby tests PASS. We could revert r1293375 now if the Ruby tests have a mechanism to mark tests XFAIL. -- uberSVN: Apache Subversion Made Easy http://www.uberSVN.com
