On Feb 9, 2012 3:07 PM, "Paul Burba" <ptbu...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 2:50 PM, Johan Corveleyn <jcor...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 7:59 PM, Greg Stein <gst...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> On Feb 9, 2012 1:23 PM, "Paul Burba" <ptbu...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> > >>> On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 11:49 AM, Daniel Shahaf <danie...@elego.de> wrote: > >>> >... > >> > >>> > It is suggested there that setting > >>> > libsvn_ra_serf/update.c:MAX_NR_OF_CONNS > >>> > to "2" will prevent ra_serf from driving multiple window handlers > >>> > concurrently and thus avoid the bug. (Presumably by causing the file to > >>> > finish on the right side of the errant close_directory() call.) > >>> > >>> I just tried MAX_NR_OF_CONNS=2 with > >>> ^/subversion/branches/1.7.x@1242422 and the test still fails: > >> > >> Woah. Weird. I may have been mistaken. Please try 1. > >> > >> If that fails, then more investigation is needed. > > > > I just tried with MAX_NR_OF_CONNS=1 and it still fails. > > Same for me.
Thanks, guys. It seems there is something wrong, probably independent of ordering issues. Sigh. -g
