On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 2:50 PM, Johan Corveleyn <jcor...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 7:59 PM, Greg Stein <gst...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> On Feb 9, 2012 1:23 PM, "Paul Burba" <ptbu...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 11:49 AM, Daniel Shahaf <danie...@elego.de> wrote: >>> >... >> >>> > It is suggested there that setting >>> > libsvn_ra_serf/update.c:MAX_NR_OF_CONNS >>> > to "2" will prevent ra_serf from driving multiple window handlers >>> > concurrently and thus avoid the bug. (Presumably by causing the file to >>> > finish on the right side of the errant close_directory() call.) >>> >>> I just tried MAX_NR_OF_CONNS=2 with >>> ^/subversion/branches/1.7.x@1242422 and the test still fails: >> >> Woah. Weird. I may have been mistaken. Please try 1. >> >> If that fails, then more investigation is needed. > > I just tried with MAX_NR_OF_CONNS=1 and it still fails.
Same for me. Paul
