Hi, Neels,

Von: Neels J Hofmeyr [mailto:ne...@elego.de]
> 
> if I understand you correctly, you are saying that there's no need for
> svn:hold, as changelists already do what they are supposed to do.
> 
> But changelists and svn:hold have entirely different use cases.
> 
> 1) svn:hold is exclusive, changelists are inclusive.
>    I mean you can use an svn:hold on *one* file to block it, or you'd
>    have to add *all other* files to a change list, what a bummer.

At least this usecase is supported by TortoiseSVN via the
"ignore-on-commit" changelist.



Best regards

Markus Schaber

___________________________
We software Automation.

3S-Smart Software Solutions GmbH
Markus Schaber | Developer
Memminger Str. 151 | 87439 Kempten | Germany | Tel. +49-831-54031-0 |
Fax +49-831-54031-50

Email: m.scha...@3s-software.com | Web: http://www.3s-software.com 
CoDeSys internet forum: http://forum.3s-software.com
Download CoDeSys sample projects:
http://www.3s-software.com/index.shtml?sample_projects

Managing Directors: Dipl.Inf. Dieter Hess, Dipl.Inf. Manfred Werner |
Trade register: Kempten HRB 6186 | Tax ID No.: DE 167014915

Reply via email to