On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 06:18, Philip Martin <philip.mar...@wandisco.com> wrote: > Greg Stein <gst...@gmail.com> writes: > >> Right. That pretty much summarizes my feeling. I don't want to respond >> in-line since you summarize it well: without real-life examples, we >> have nothing to work against here. > > So I've put some of the concerns in the issue tracker: > > http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3979 > http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3980 > http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3981
Thank you. As Daniel stated, if the issues are not raised, then they are *not* issues/blockers. Per my comments in 3979, I feel that one is the most critical. I believe that we need to probe the server to determine whether some broken crap has been interposed. I'm of a mind to say "fix your shit", but also know that we can do something to work around the problem. Justin's patch is interesting, but I believe it "happens to work", and a higher-level solution is needed. I also believe that 3980 is simply server-misconfiguration: servers/proxies need to enable caching to get the wins that ra_serf should make possible (with no loss to users who continue to use ra_neon). >... Cheers, -g
