On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 2:34 AM, Greg Stein <gst...@gmail.com> wrote: > Yet... we have seen bugs crop up over the past week in a number of > other areas (merge? mod_dav_svn? log? fs txns?). We accept those as > normal. They're fixed and backported. This is how we should be > operating on ra_serf, too. There is nothing special about it.
+1. I feel that there are certain folks in the community that are constantly and actively changing the goal posts. Every time someone says, "Oh, ra_serf can't do X" or "ra_serf isn't as fast as ra_neon", we either add those features or significantly beat the pants off ra_neon. We've been passing all of the functionality tests for years now - yet nothing we do is ever good enough for some. I'm still not aware of any issues that we haven't either fixed or have come up with solutions for. -- justin