On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 1:26 PM, Daniel Shahaf <d...@daniel.shahaf.name> wrote: > I also note there is a 1.7.0-milestone filed which is not yet resolved. > > (it's a trivial issue, though) > > C. Michael Pilato wrote on Thu, Aug 04, 2011 at 13:25:01 -0400: >> On 08/04/2011 12:31 PM, Mark Phippard wrote: >> > On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 12:20 PM, Hyrum K Wright <hyrum.wri...@wandisco.com >> > <mailto:hyrum.wri...@wandisco.com>> wrote: >> > >> > There hasn't been strong sentiment voiced one way or the other, so >> > I'll proceed with RC-1 today. >> > >> > Looking forward to it! +1 from me. >> > >> > Should we start some thread about Neon/Serf? Or just call for a formal >> > vote? Greg has not withdrawn his veto, so I am not sure what we do next. >> >> I'm withholding my +1 until we settle the ra-dav issue, unless folks believe >> that such a change made post-rc-1 would not require a soak restart. I defer >> in that matter to the wisdom of the greater community.
Bah. So it seems we do have some pending issues folks want to clean up, so whatever I roll today will be beta3, not rc1. (It's been a couple of weeks, and there are a few good fixes, so I do feel another pre-release is warranted.) -Hyrum -- uberSVN: Apache Subversion Made Easy http://www.uberSVN.com/
