> On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 1:48 PM, Hyrum K Wright > <hyrum.wri...@wandisco.com> wrote: > > All, > > 1.7.0-beta2 is out in the wild, and folks are testing it. I know > > we're still fixing bug and STATUS is still a bit active, but how > do > > folks feel about starting the release candidate train? Or, if > you're > > uncomfortable with that now, what are your criteria for doing so? > > > > Reminder: small fixes can still go into the release branch after > the > > first release candidate, and be included in the final release. > Only > > critical (read: blocking) issues will restart the soak. > > Update: > It looks like we've continued to have some churn and small bug > fixes, > which is great. I'm afk for the first part of next week, but would > like to plan on a release candidate rolling on Thursday, Aug. 4. > > The one major simmering issue discussed elsewhere in this thread is > the serf v. neon issue, and while I won't take sides (in this > mail), I > hope we can make a decision and be united in moving forward, simply > because rehashing it every week is getting old. > > In other news, I had several comments about 1.7 while at OSCON this > week, mainly from alumni of the project (Karl, Brian, Ben, etc), > but > also from other corners. It's nice that people are noticing. > > -Hyrum
Frankly, as a user I was waiting for beta2 before I did any testing and would like to see one that went for a while before rolling an RC. BOb
