On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 12:16 PM, Daniel Shahaf <d...@daniel.shahaf.name> wrote:
> If svnsync presents the lock token that's present on the master, and > hopefully the slave checks locks against the master during commit, the > commit is going to work isn't it? Apache proxies commits back to the master. When you are using svnsync to update the replica it is not going through that proxy. In my case it using file://, but in the book it uses a special Apache location that does not proxy. So no, it does not check against the master. > Point is: using 'svnadmin lock', despite creating locks on the slave's > FS, doesn't change the fact that those locks are *cached* locks, they > aren't binding/normative in any way. That would be the ideal but it is not true today. I also do not think svnsync even presents a lock token since there is no working copy involved to provide the token. -- Thanks Mark Phippard http://markphip.blogspot.com/
